Evil Portents

[Rob Bowman]

Greetings,

>From: Dragncln1 at aol.com
>Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:18:56 EDT

> > Any reason "Your" is capitialized ;)?
>
>None. It was meant to refer to both of You in a sign of Respect.

Nice recovery ;).

> > Well coming from an old Scout I think there is a big difference ;).  
>Ambush
> > is against an unprepared opponent in an undefended position.  Sneak 
>attack
> > just implies unprepared.  I actually think the card accurately
> > differentiate.
>
>Point taken in their attempt to differentiate between the two, but I also
>feel there is much room for interpretation. I can only refer to how You
>described the "feeling" of playing the card and having it played against 
>Me.
>(Or was that Jeff?).

That was me.

>I actually feel the ambush is a more "honorable" play if
>You will, because You have to take a penalty for getting an advantage. And 
>if
>it eliminates an enemy that could potentially kill off My personalities, I
>have no problem wit it.

I have no problem with either.  I was just commenting that I think they got 
the cards right.

>As always Shokan San, enjoying Your discussion and learning from You all 
>the
>time.

You need some better teachers my friend ;).

Take care,
Rob- Mirumoto Shokan
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com